Discussion in ' Canon Lenses ' started by davidhqMar 17, Canon kit mm versus much more expensive mm Discussion in ' Canon Lenses ' started by davidhqMar 17, Mar 17, 1. I am testing my new expensive mm lens versus the kit lens. I have Canon D My question: I barely see the difference in quality except in one example first two photos. Is this normal? Do you see more difference? There is probably some difference in contrast in other pictures too, but I think it's neglible.
I don't see the difference in sharpness at all Would there be more difference in different conditions? Please let me know! Regards, David. Mar 17, 2. PS: is always the first picture of the pair Mar 17, 3. Mar 17, 4. Thank you for the answer The only reason why it's strange to me is because I read the following on the forums: The image quality of the mm is miles better than the mm IS lens. I have both lenses used with a 50D and can say without question the is far superior.
The image quality of the It is absolutely far better than the I own both lenes and can say that the has much better resolution than the So is all of this BS or what? Mar 17, 5. If the kit lens is anything like the kit lens I have sitting here, it feels like an empty plastic tube without glass.
The kit lens is good for shooting lots of things, but it isn't really a very strong lens. There are usually reasons why more expensive lenses are more expensive, the glass quality, construction and sharpness. Try shooting a group shot with 40 people using both lenses and then have a good look at the faces, you will see the difference in overall quality from the non-kit lens.
Mar 17, 6. Moving to the Canon Lens forum. Mar 17, 7.50mm vs 85mm for Portrait Photography + Behind the Scenes
While I'm not a Canonite, so I can't speak with first-hand knowledge, in general, almost any lens will turn in a decent result under average conditions and those are certainly average conditions in your test shots.You don't need to use a fast prime lens to capture great portrait photography. In this tutorial we'll show you how to take amazing people pictures using simple mm lenses and a reflector.
Subscribe to RSS
In addition to our mm lens, we're using a reflector to bounce light into the shadows of our model's face. We dressed our model in winter clothing and accessories to suit the seasonal theme - bright hats and gloves, and fur hoods or coats all work well. The 'classic' focal length for portraits is usually said to be around 85mm, so you'll want to zoom your mm lens to its longest focal length of 55mm, or close to it 55mm multiplied by the 1.
Narrow apertures also capture more depth of field, so you'll need to put plenty of space between your subject and their backdrop to ensure that you can blur the background effectively.
At the editing stage we'll show you how to cool your image's colours to enhance the wintry feel, and even add some fake snow! We sat our model on a bench, with her back to the sun so it created a backlight around the edges of her hair - there was also a bit of wind that helped create movement in the hair. You want to strike a balance between shooting at a focal length that will flatter your subject, which on a crop-factor camera will be around 30mm and above, and using a wide-enough aperture to give you a fast-enough shutter speed for shooting handheld.
You might be able to get away with ISO if there's enough light - just remember to keep an eye on your shutter speed as you're shooting. To help you focus on your subject accurately select the Single point AF setting, and select a focus point that corresponds to the position of your subject in the frame.
You're now ready to start shooting. You can get your model to hold the reflector, but for the best results you'll need an assistant to hold it, so your model's movements aren't restricted. The best way to use your reflector If you have a five-in-one reflector you can opt to use the silver or the gold side. The silver side creates a cooler result, and the gold side creates warmer light, so we'd recommend using the silver side for your winter portrait shoot.
You may find it useful to get an assistant to hold the reflector for you, as this will leave your and your model's hands free. When you're using a reflector make sure the light isn't shining directly into your model's eyes, as you don't want them to be squinting. Choose the right backdrop The backdrop is an important element of a portrait, and it can make the difference between a good shot and a great one. In our park setting we looked for colours that complemented our model, and which looked attractive when blurred.
Despite what you'll often hear about not shooting into the sun, it's a rule you can break with portraits, as long as you can get enough light on to your model's face.Hopefully, you can walk away with a better understanding of which lens might be the best upgrade for you. The Canon 60D is an APS-C sensor cropped sensor camera, so in order to determine the functioning focal length of these lenses on this camera, multiply the lens focal length by 1. So on a cropped sensor camera, the 50mm lens functions roughly as an 80mm lens, and the 50mm lens functions as a mm lens.
With the 85mm lens, the minimum focusing distance is 2. This means that in general, you will be standing further away from your subject with the 85mm lens, than you will with the 50mm.
In turn, this decreases the depth of fieldwhich means that images shot with the 85mm lens tend to have much blurrier bokeh than images shot with the 50mm lens, even when using the same aperture. The cherry blossoms are fairly well blurred in both images, but the shape of the blossoms is more defined in the image taken with the 50mm lens, and the blossoms are significantly more blurred and creamy in the image that with the 85mm lens.
Of course, everyone has a different preference when it comes to bokeh. Some prefer the more uniform creaminess that the 85mm lens offers, while other photographers prefer to have a little more definition in the background.
You may even find that you prefer different approaches in different applications! For example, I usually favor the more uniform bokeh of the 85mm lens.
If you find that you are always drawn to the creamier texture, then the 85mm lens may be a better fit for you. If you prefer a bit more texture in the background, you may want to consider the 50mm lens instead.
In addition, spend some time thinking about the content of your backdrops. Using an 85mm lens will result in an image that is more closely framed on your subject.
On the other hand, shooting with the 50mm lens will result in an image that includes more of the background though not nearly as much as shooting with the Canon 24mm lens. Do you happily hike up to the top of a mountain for a photo session? You might want to consider the 50mm lens in order to more fully capture the trees and vistas in the background behind your portrait subject s. This image was taken in exactly the same place as the previous one, only using the 85mm lens instead of the 50mm.
On the other hand, do you often find yourself trying to disguise the background in your images? In that case, you may want to consider the 85mm lens. When you combine the decreased depth of field of the 85mm lens with the closer framing of your subject, the 85mm lens is stellar at creating beautiful portrait images at almost any location.
More Useful Than You Think! How The 18-55mm Lens Can Help You
Our house is just over 1, square feet, and depending on the room, sometimes I physically cannot back up far enough to use my 85mm lens. Your mileage may vary. In that situation, standing further away from my subjects is a good thing.Paolo foggi cv
I can let my kids play and have fun without being all up in their business. As you can see, both of these lenses are great for capturing portrait-style images of people — I personally keep both in my camera bag and use them with near equal frequency. Left: 85mm lens Right: 50mm lens. This image was taken with 50mm lens. This image was taken with 85mm lens.I remember the smile from ear to ear when I opened the box to my brand new Canon D DSLR and set it up with the focal length kit lens that came with it.
My camera came with a standard EFS mm f3. As with many of us, off I went and began practicing, learning and photographing everything in sight.
Of course, after some time had passed and I got hired more frequently, it became necessary to add to my arsenal than just my kit lens, but my mm lens was always within reach in my kit lens for different situations.
Yes, you read that right, I held on to it, and have on occasion used it. Your kit lens however, is still a good lens and versatile if you use it right. Before you pass over this lens as a choice, here are some reasons you should consider keeping your kit lens on hand. That being said, remember that a lot of DSLR choices come with a kit lens in the box which typically is the mmor as in the case of the Canon 80D, the mm, which is also a great lens.
The ef-s mm is a great lens to get acquainted with how these kit lenses work, understanding maximum aperture and challenging your knowledge and skill when it comes to taking photos. Understanding maximum aperture is just an example. Especially when you are starting out with these kit lenses.
Read this handy 6 step guide on how to take sharper photos. Something else about this worthy to consider is the versatility in the focal length in this kit lens. The 18mm end of the kit lens can serve as a wide angle option when you need it.
So if you are drawn to things like, architecture, landscapes, or shoot live events or music this is a great lens if you are limited in your wide angle kit lens mm roster.
Here are a couple examples from when I needed a wider option to catch the moment and went with the ef-s mm kit lens as the choice. The photo from above is from one of my very first weddings that I shadowed. The bride was to make an entrance from the upstairs to meet with her dad, before she walked down the aisle. I had a prime lens mounted, but I wanted to get the whole staircase with her coming down to add a bit more of a dramatic look for this shot.
I opted for the mm kit lens, which was the widest I carried at the time before the ceremony started. This moment, was just before the ceremony started and the brides brother, was assigned to play some music just prior to the entrance of the bridal party. It was really special for them that he was doing this, and so again, I wanted to have a wider shot to catch him, and some attendees. This focal range is still only a moderate level of wide angle for your photos.
There are other options out there if you need to catch more of the scene through the kit lens such as, mm, mm to name a couple. As with wide angle kit lenses, there are several choices on the market for a good zoom lens.
This lens however, can still provide you with some good lens on hands training when utilizing the entire zoom range. If you ever make it out to this amazing part of the world, you should know that touching Sea Turtles is a major no-no.In the photo trade, these kinds of kits are often split, so you can nab this lens for very little money.
What do you get for a zoom lens below euros? A full plastic housing and no image stabilization is a step back in time, just like the Canon EOS D is in some ways. That it has no image stabilization is a pity, especially for the target group. Novice photographers often do not have the best shooting technique, and a mistake in keeping the camera steady or selecting the correct shutter speed is then easily made.
Without image stabilization, that is punished immediately because you have a blurred photo. Hopefully you will learn quickly from that, but it does take away some of the fun of shooting. The housing of the lens is entirely of plastic, up to and including the mount. The focus ring is actually not a focus ring, but just a ribbed thickening of the front of the lens, so you can grab the tube and twist it a bit.
The lens does have a nice wide zoom ring and has one switch: for changing between autofocus and manual focus. The lens does not have image stabilization. There are 11 elements in 9 groups, one of which is an aspherical element.
The sharpness is reasonable, especially at the shorter focal points. At 55mm, the sharpness at full aperture is significantly less. It may have to do with our specific test copy or with the extra play that is in the tube when you zoom all the way out. In the wide-angle position, the distortion is 1.
The vignetting is as expected and at its highest in the wide-angle position. If you stop down a bit or zoom in, the vignetting decreases. But that halves after stopping down one stop.
If you systematically stop down this lens one stop, then the results are generally pretty good. What was noticeable was that the chromatic aberrations were slightly higher than with the version II of the same lens. Thanks in part to this zoom, Canon can keep the price of the EOS D under euros, including lens. The lens does not even perform that badly.
Our test copy was only a bit disappointing at 55mm, but then especially at full opening. Otherwise, you can work with it, and it performs reasonably on the megapixel D. If you need a standard zoom lens and your budget is very tight, then this is a good option. This lens is also a great choice for projects where you run the risk that your equipment will not survive car chases, explosions. However, if you have a few more dollars to spend, do yourself a favor and buy one of the versions with image stabilization.
Canon camera p reviews. Tags: CanonStarter. Type your text and hit enter to search.Hi guys. I hope I'm not bothering people too much with the questions.
I'm what you'd call a novice, and am trying to learn all I can, as quick as I can. My daughter is often using my D, and when we go out with the dogs together, we are often fighting over it - as we both love photography, lol.
She has a compact at the moment. I am considering giving her my cam for her birthday in a few weeks as she's asked for a SLRand then myself moving upto D - as the D is just too high for my budget. I am thinking of buying the Body only.
As unlike the kit lens it has the IS on it What I DO like about the kit lens, is the Wide-ness.
I find it good for taking scenery photography, which I do a lot of. Any good for scenery photography? Or is there a better lens I could get? As of right now and probably for the foreseeable future I won't be able to afford anything else - apart from the Body those two lens I mean.
Please note, this is a hobby for me, not a profession. So, I cant afford all the big gear etc. That said, Can anyone comment? Thank you for any help you can give. The is actually 1mm wider than the which translates to maybe a couple of degrees wider angle of view.
If you can swing it, a IS and IS combo gives you a really nice range. I wouldn't put a III on a D, given your experience level. If your photography is rather casual and you prefer to put one lens on the camera and leave it there, the mm EFS lens could be fine for you. It will not produce better image quality but the extra 30mm might be useful to you if you feel that 55mm is not long enough for you.
The more significant difference is at the long end - 85mm is quite noticeably longer than 55mm.
17-85mm VS 18-55mm
If I were in your shoes I would just get the newer version of the mm kit lens since it is supposedly a bit better in optical terms than the old version and because it includes image-stabilization. You may well be very happy with that lens alone.
If not, having shot a lot of photos you'll be a a better position to figure out what specific features you are looking for in an additional lens.Photography Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for professional, enthusiast and amateur photographers. It only takes a minute to sign up. I was given a d with a canon mm lens, it has USM and image stabilzing. It has always seemed okay to me but after a few years i have decided to upgrade to the d, which has now come with a mm kit lens.Anandtech ryzen 5
This one has STM and also image stabilzation. I am mostly interested in the wide angle of the lens, so the extra doesnt do much for me, and the is pretty close for me purposes.Whakarongo mai ra
My question is which one has better image quality on the wide end. I am curious as to why as well, besides for seeing that the has a wider aperature, the just feels better.
The feeling i mean in terms of industrial build quality, it seems to be less fragile. I also see that the end of the lens is over 60mm, not like the 52mm of the kit lens or the other intro lenses such as mm.Judasbaum kopen nl
Does this size have something to do with it? Prior to STM, USM was the preferred option because it was fast and quiet relative to other kinds of motors that are available. However, it isn't fluid which becomes an issue with video. Enter STM which is also quiet though I'm not sure which is more quiet and provides a smooth transition as it focuses rather than a jerky back and forth.
As far as image quality, if you have both lenses available and you can't tell the difference between two pictures that you take, does it matter? I'd recommend looking at sites that review these kinds of things, but Roger Cicala and Lensrentals. So try for yourself and use which you feel more comfortable with.
The current IS is a very sharp lens. Optically superior to the over the common range. The build quality is not as good, as well as the AF speed and accuracy. According to the Photozone. I don't have either of them, you can compare their specifications on DPReview. This is kind of a hard head-to-head comparison, but basically, the EF-S was an upgrade over the contemporaneous kit lenses of its day --the non-USM, non-IS first version.
The IS STM version of the kit lens, however, is something like the eighth version of that lensintroduced inso it's a spanking new design, and probably performs quite well in comparison with the decade-older The is more in the mid-range of lenses that Canon makes, which are typically characterized by the gold ring and USM.
And the high-end tier are the red-ringed L lenses. It's mostly about build quality, and usability features. Larger max. At each tier, you end up with diminishing returns, and much heftier price leaps. Sign up to join this community. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top. Differences between canon mm and mm Ask Question.
Asked 6 years, 11 months ago. Active 6 years, 4 months ago. Viewed 11k times. Improve this question. Add a comment. Active Oldest Votes.
- Vetreria casaro jesolo
- Usaha bangkrut surabaya
- K104 radio personalities
- Soweto Gospel Choir
- Noco gb40 walmart
- B207r engine upgrades
- Indicated operation fractions
- Persian vegetable stew
- Obelix and co
- Pokemon cherubi evolution
- Gigi laboratories acnon
- Magri handbags price
- Ltspice ac analysis
- Mfp 135a driver
- Looked synonym dictionary
- Sata power pinout
- Grundfos ups 25- 80
- Casey cott engaged
- Key2benefits lost card